Issues | Solutions | BSC Journal | Join Us | Contact | Shop | Home

10.29.2007

Bitterroot group calls for giving wildfires less fuel

By PERRY BACKUS of the Missoulian (repost of article)

CONNER - Tom and Charlotte Robak have always considered themselves environmentalists.

It was their love of everything wild that brought them to Montana in the first place a decade ago. Along the West Fork of the Bitterroot, the couple found a stunning landscape complete with clean water, fresh air and abundant wildlife. The long warm days of summer seemed almost perfect.

That all changed in 2000 - the year that hundreds of thousands of acres of forest lands went up in smoke in the Bitterroot. Along with hundreds of others, the Robaks were evacuated from their home. When they prepared to move downstream that same summer, they found a firefighter camp set up on their front pasture. Since then, the Robaks - along with everyone else in western Montana - have lived with wildfire smoke for weeks on end through the summer months. Now they want their summers back. The couple believes that Montana's "silent majority" wants that, too.

On Sunday, Nov. 4, the Robaks are hoping people will turn out by the hundreds at the Ravalli County Fairgrounds' First Interstate Building in Hamilton to take part in a 4 p.m. rally being hosted by the new Big Sky Coalition: Environmentalists with Common Sense.

Their intent is to create a groundswell of common folk interested in pushing for changes in the way national forest lands are managed. "I believe we're at a tipping point right now," Tom Robak said. "People want something different. They want some management for our forests."

The idea for the new coalition followed discussions with the Bitterroot National Forest, retired foresters and members of the Bitterroot Valley community. U.S. Forest Service officials told Robak the agency would like to do more fuel reduction work and timber harvests, but challenges from some environmental groups have tied their hands through administrative appeals and court challenges.

"I believe the silent majority of people living here don't want a few small environmental groups to run forest management policy any more," Robak said. "I believe people are looking for some common sense."

The Robaks learned quickly that many people in the valley were on the same page. In a short time, 15 people stepped forward to serve on the coalition's steering committee. They raised $6,000 to advertise the upcoming rally and developed a mission statement. That statement reads: "Big Sky Coalition represents a diverse group of Montanans who believe that current forest management policies are resulting in annual catastrophic fires. These fires present a negative impact on the health and economic interest of Montana citizens.

"Representing what we believe to be a silent majority of Montanans with common sense, we hope to become a unified voice of reason that will provide a more balanced approach to environmental issues. ... Our mission is to work with federal and state agencies to bring about changes in the current fire management program."

Rosie Huckstadt and her husband, Gene, were among those who stepped forward. Since the early 1990s, the couple has worked with others in Darby to revitalize the town into a tourist stop for visitors traveling between Yellowstone and Glacier national parks. "People worked from one end of town to the other to transform this into a town with a Western theme," she said.

"People care about this place and they worked hard to make it happen." But since 2000, the pall of wildfire smoke that fills the Bitterroot Valley every summer has hurt tourism. "We've had seven summers filled with gray skies of smoke. People come here because they want to see our beautiful valley and go up in the mountains," Huckstadt said. "They don't want us to have to tell them there really are beautiful mountains there behind the smoke. They want to see it for themselves." There's been an impact. Some Darby business owners have closed their doors.

"After all that hard work - thousands and thousands of hours of it - it's really sad to see that happen ... especially since I believe this was man-caused," she said. "I believe it's important that we allow our forests to be managed."

Huckstadt hopes that people who feel the same way will step forward and be counted. "We're hoping that the people who've been silent for so long will come forward and speak up," she said. "We hope the politicians will listen."

On the state level, Sen. Rick Laible, R-Darby, said politicians are already on board.

Last session, Laible introduced legislation requiring the state to support sustainable forest management practices on all forest lands, including those managed by the Forest Service. Senate Bill 293 also opened the door for the state to intervene on litigation or appeals that challenge federal forest management projects. The bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan support.

"People want to complain about the Forest Service, but they are doing the best they can with the resources they have," Laible said. "Almost every time they try to do something, they get sued." Laible said there has to be balance in the management of national forests. "The days of the clearcuts are gone," he said. "It is time for forest management to return."

While most Montanans want national forest lands to be managed, Laible said many people have simply given up because they believe their voices won't be heard by the federal government. "I believe the silent majority isn't being heard," he said. "It's not organized. This is an opportunity for people to step forward and be heard. I'm not sure where this is going to go, but it's a start."

Retired national forest supervisor Sonny LaSalle will moderate the discussion. While he's hopeful a crowd will fill the fairground's facility, he is also a bit skeptical. "It's hard to get people in the Bitterroot excited about doing something," LaSalle said.

When the 2000 fires were burning, LaSalle helped with a program that offered residents information about how to fireproof their homes. The farther away he got from the flames, the smaller the crowds became.

It's been weeks now since smoke filled the valley, and he wonders how long those collective memories last.

"Our objective is to try to convert the silent majority into the vocal majority," LaSalle said. "I know there's a general disbelief in the federal government. People don't know if they can have an effect.

"There are people out there who say there's no use saying anything or doing anything, because nothing is going to change. If people don't make sure their voices are heard, then they're right. Nothing will change."

Reprinted under the Fair Use doctrine of international copyright law. Full copyright retained by the original publication. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

To comment on this post via email, click here.

10.14.2007

Letters of Support

Message of support from Western Institute, December 6, 2007

"
The BSC holds promise. It’s grassroots, political, and the members are angry at the destruction of their local economies and landscapes. Congress should pay heed."

Read more...
###

Letter to the Editor, repost from the Ravalli Republic, 11/29/2007

Work together to overcome differences

Okay, okay, I’m an obstructionist. To me, it’s another word for conservative.

I’m conservative about conservation and the use of natural resources. I’m conservative about interfering with natural processes before we really understand how nature’s managed to live without our fiddling for billions of years.

So, I agree to wear the label obstructionist without rancor. Of course, when that label was spit out by an audience member at the Big Sky Coalition’s Nov. 4 meeting, it was meant to wound and polarize. For sure it wasn’t used in an effort to promote consensus.

I was surprised then, to find that the Robaks who initiated the meeting and the facilitator, Sonny LaSalle, were sincere and serious about keeping the lid on an audience that came loaded for bear (both sides n there were more than a few conservative conservationists in the audience). For that, I say “Thank you!” We need more community meetings with that objective. While they’re not nearly as much fun as gatherings where people get to yell and scream and call each other names, there is an upside. It may actually lead to discussion on how to deal with wildfire in the valley.

So here’s a common sense suggestion from an obstructionist. If the Big Sky Coalition really wants to get something done, the key phrase is “baby steps.”

Much of reaching consensus on wildfires requires building trust. There’s no way Congress is going to give us the money to thin 40,000 acres of forest/year in the near future. It certainly won’t if we aren’t speaking with one voice. So start small. Begin with what we agree on and can realistically do.

A problem with Bush’s forest management plan is that it pays for thinning by selling timber. I know that sounds reasonable to some but to others it’s a sneaky way to resume wholesale logging.

Again, if the coalition is truly interested in forest health and in accomplishing something; humor us. Let’s work together to get money appropriated to do thinning projects in low elevation areas adjacent to private lands without using timber sales to pay for it. There are more than enough of these areas to keep us busy for awhile. It’ll give us time to assess each other and see if we can reach common ground on a bigger scale.

Disparate groups throughout the state are putting together fuel reduction projects. We can do it here too. The question that’s yet to be answered is: Does the newly formed coalition really want to work together or is it just making conciliatory noises while attempting to shove a gag down our throats?

Lastly, what are we going to do with all the thinned material? One option is using it for manufacturing composite lumber. There’s a homegrown company ready to set up a mill in Darby but it lacks the capital to make it happen. Throwing our collective weight behind obtaining money for mutually agreeable thinning projects, as well as getting a company started that can use the product, just might make us feel good enough about ourselves that we won’t need to get in each other’s faces.

You can call me naïve (and I have been), but I know that working together for a common goal provides all of the pleasures of a good fight without raising blood pressure. What have we got to lose? I say, let’s give it a try.

Pat Tucker

Hamilton

###

Letter to the Editor, repost from the Ravalli Republic, 11/23/2007

Unbalanced reporting

For anyone who did not attend the Big Sky Coalition-Environmentalist[s] with common sense rally Sunday, Nov. 5 but who would like to know how it went, what it was about, who was there, what was presented, etc. I would like to suggest that you buy the Monday, Nov. 6 edition of the Missoulian. You certainly won’t get any of that information by reading the article by Kristin Knight in the Ravalli Republic on Tuesday.

What you will get by reading the 167 lines of Kristin Knight’s Ravalli article is 96 lines devoted to Jim Miller and the FOB’s opinion.

You will also read 36 lines of print devoted to stressing the stream setback issue (or in this case, non issue) as the subject did appear in some of the ads for the rally but was not discussed at the rally except by Tom Robak’s comment that it would not be discussed and was not going to be an issue dealt with by the Big Sky Coalition. Period.

I am very glad that I went to the rally and had the chance to hear Tom Robak, Sonny LaSalle, Mick Dezel, Jack Losenksy, Mark Jergens, Alan Thompson and Sen. Rick Laible present information and address issues.

They helped answer questions about how vegetation changes, what’s happened to our forests in the last 50 years, how Forest Service management affects our county and what are the health effects of wood smoke.

I’m glad that I did not depend on getting information about the rally from the Ravalli Republic coverage as, in this case, they failed miserably.

Shirley Maydole

Hamilton

###


To comment on this post via email, click here.

View Stats
Funny viagra stories search buy viagra
Get viagra how to buy viagra. Does viagra work buy viagra no script.